The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design

Constantine A. Gatsonis , Denise R. Aberle , Christine D. Berg , Constantine A. Gatsonis , Denise R. Aberle , Christine D. Berg , William C. Black , Timothy R. Church , Richard M. Fagerstrom , Barbara Galen , Ilana F. Gareen , Jonathan Goldin , John K. Gohagan , Bruce J. Hillman , C. Carl Jaffe , Barnett S. Kramer , David A. Lynch , Pamela M. Marcus , Mitchell D. Schnall , Daniel C. Sullivan , Dorothy Sullivan , Carl J. Zylak , Christopher H. Cagnon , Dianna D. Cody , Glenn Fletcher , Michael Flynn , Philip F. Judy , Randell Kruger , Frederick J. Larke , Michael F. McNitt‐Gray , Thomas Payne , J. Anthony Seibert , Xizeng Wu , Gerald F. Abbott , Judith K. Amorosa , R. Graham Barr , Phillip M. Boiselle , Caroline Chiles , Robert A. Clark , Lynn Coppage , Robert Falk , Elliot K. Fishman , David Gemmel , Jonathan Goldin , Eric T. Goodman , Eric Hart , Todd R. Hazelton , Elizabeth Johnson , Ella A. Kazerooni , Barbara L. McComb , Geoffrey McLennan , Reginald F. Munden , James Ravenel , Michael A. Sullivan , Stephen J. Swensen , Drew A. Torigian , Kay H. Vydareny , John A. Worrell , Peter W. Balkin , Mona N. Fouad , Matthew T. Freedman , Kavita Garg , Edward P. Gelmann , David S. Gierada , William G. Hocking , Subbarao Inampudi , Claudine Isaacs , Paul A. Kvale , Howard Mann , William Manor , Hrudaya Nath , Douglas J. Reding , David L. Spizarny , Diane C. Strollo , John Waltz , Mei‐Hsiu Chen , Fenghai Duan , Grant Izmirilian , Paul F. Pinsky , Philip C. Prorok , Anthony B. Miller , Martin J. Edelman , William K. Evans , Robert S. Fontana , Mitchell Machtay , Kenneth W. Clark , Kathy L. Clingan , Melissa Ford , Guillermo Márquez , Steven M. Moore , Peter Ohan , Thomas Payne , Steven Peace , Jennifer L. Rosenbaum , R. Graham Barr , William C. Black , Drew A. Torigian , Kay H. Vydareny , John A. Worrell , Robert C. Young , David S. Alberts , David L. DeMets , Peter Greenwald
2010 Radiology 1,227 citations

Abstract

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) is a randomized multicenter study comparing low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) with chest radiography in the screening of older current and former heavy smokers for early detection of lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Five-year survival rates approach 70% with surgical resection of stage IA disease; however, more than 75% of individuals have incurable locally advanced or metastatic disease, the latter having a 5-year survival of less than 5%. It is plausible that treatment should be more effective and the likelihood of death decreased if asymptomatic lung cancer is detected through screening early enough in its preclinical phase. For these reasons, there is intense interest and intuitive appeal in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. The use of survival as the determinant of screening effectiveness is, however, confounded by the well-described biases of lead time, length, and overdiagnosis. Despite previous attempts, no test has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality, an endpoint that circumvents screening biases and provides a definitive measure of benefit when assessed in a randomized controlled trial that enables comparison of mortality rates between screened individuals and a control group that does not undergo the screening intervention of interest. The NLST is such a trial. The rationale for and design of the NLST are presented.

Keywords

MedicineNational Lung Screening TrialOverdiagnosisLung cancer screeningRandomized controlled trialLung cancerAsymptomaticClinical endpointClinical trialStage (stratigraphy)RadiologyInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
258
Issue
1
Pages
243-253
Citations
1227
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1227
OpenAlex

Cite This

Constantine A. Gatsonis, Denise R. Aberle, Christine D. Berg et al. (2010). The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design. Radiology , 258 (1) , 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091808

Identifiers

DOI
10.1148/radiol.10091808