Abstract

ABSTRACT We provide an empirical examination of the determinants of corporate debt maturity. Our evidence offers strong support for the contracting‐cost hypothesis. Firms that have few growth options, are large, or are regulated have more long‐term debt in their capital structure. We find little evidence that firms use the maturity structure of their debt to signal information to the market. The evidence is consistent, however, with the hypothesis that firms with larger information asymmetries issue more short‐term debt. We find no evidence that taxes affect debt maturity.

Keywords

Capital structureMaturity (psychological)DebtMonetary economicsDebt levels and flowsInternal debtEmpirical evidenceBusinessInformation asymmetryEconomicsEquity valueDebt-to-GDP ratioFinancial economicsFinance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Capital Structure Puzzle

Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...

1984 The Journal of Finance 7515 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
609-631
Citations
1683
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1683
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael J. Barclay, Clifford W. Smith (1995). The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt. The Journal of Finance , 50 (2) , 609-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04797.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04797.x