Abstract

Abstract This paper describes the rationale and methods entailed in developing the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) in both clinician‐rated (IDS‐C) and self‐reported (IDS‐SR) formats. Psychometric features of the both the IDS‐C and IDS‐SR are presented. These scales are compared to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS‐D) in the detection of symptom change in patients with major depressive (n = 184) or bipolar disorder (n = 141). The face validity and established psychometric features of the IDS‐C and IDS‐SR indicate that either may be useful in detecting symptom change, as well as in detecting residual symptoms in depressed patients. Further efforts to shorten each measure are indicated. Copyright © 2000 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords

Depressive symptomsDepression (economics)Rating scalePsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryScale (ratio)AnxietyDevelopmental psychology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
45-59
Citations
426
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

426
OpenAlex

Cite This

A. John Rush, Thomas Carmody, Paul‐Egbert Reimitz (2000). The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Clinician (IDS‐C) and Self‐Report (IDS‐SR) ratings of depressive symptoms. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research , 9 (2) , 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.79

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/mpr.79