Abstract

This paper provides a theory of legislative institutions that parallels the theory of the firm and the theory of contractual institutions. Like market institutions, legislative institutions reflect two key components: the goals or preferences of individuals (here, representatives seeking reelection) and the relevant transactions costs. The authors present three conclusions. First, they show how the legislative institutions enforce bargains among legislators. Second, they explain why, given the peculiar form of bargaining problems found in legislatures, specific forms of nonmarket exchange prove superior to market exchange. Third, their approach shows how the committee system limits the types of coalitions that may form on a particular issue. Copyright 1988 by University of Chicago Press.

Keywords

LegislatureParallelsNonmarket forcesEconomicsBusinessMarket economyPolitical scienceLawFactor market

Related Publications

THE RISE OF BIG BUSINESS

This important reference collection examines the origins and evolution of modern big business, the forms it has taken in the world's leading economies (the United States, Japan,...

1992 RePEc: Research Papers in Economics 36 citations

Publication Info

Year
1988
Type
article
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
132-163
Citations
1514
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1514
OpenAlex

Cite This

Barry R. Weingast, William Marshall (1988). The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets. Journal of Political Economy , 96 (1) , 132-163. https://doi.org/10.1086/261528

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/261528