Abstract
This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at‐risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.
Keywords
Construct (python library)PsychologyTerminologyCompetence (human resources)Embodied cognitionCriticismCritical appraisalVulnerability (computing)EpistemologyAdaptation (eye)Social psychologyPolitical scienceComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
Introduction: Appraising the quality of studies included in systematic reviews combining qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies is challenging. To address this chal...
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Convolutional neural networks are built upon the convolution operation, which extracts informative features by fusing spatial and channel-wise information together within local ...
A Scoping Review and Thematic Classification of Patient Complexity: Offering a Unifying Framework
The path to improving healthcare quality for individuals with complex health conditions is complicated by a lack of common understanding of complexity. Modern medicine, together...
Essays in experimental logic.
This critical edition of John Dewey's 1916 collection of writings on logic, in Experimental Logic - in which Dewey presents his concept of logic as the theory of inquiry and hi...
Community-Based Participatory Research for Health
If Thomas Kuhn (1962) is correct, a field of inquiry develops in stages. Some members of a field of inquiry recognize anomalies in the foundational beliefs and seek better expla...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-562
- Citations
- 8825
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
8825
OpenAlex
Cite This
Suniya S. Luthar,
Dante Cicchetti,
Bronwyn E. Becker
(2000).
The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work.
Child Development
, 71
(3)
, 543-562.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8624.00164