Abstract
From the viewpoint of a company's controlling shareholder, the optimal ownership structure generally involves some measure of dispersion, to avoid excessive monitoring by other shareholders. The optimal dispersion of share ownership can be achieved by going public, but this choice also entails some costs (the cost of listing and the loss of control over the shareholder register). If the controlling shareholder sells shares privately instead, he avoids the costs of going public but must tolerate large external shareholders who may monitor him too closely. Thus, the owner faces a trade-off between the cost of providing a liquid market and overmonitoring. The incentive to go public is stronger, the larger the amount of external funding required. The listing decision is also affected by the strictness of disclosure rules for public relative to private firms, and the legal limits on bribes aimed at dissuading monitoring by shareholders.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders
Posttakeover moral hazard by the acquirer and free‐riding by the target shareholders lead the former to acquire as few sharcs as necessary to gain control. As moral hazard is mo...
Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends
The economic literature about dividends usually assumes that managers are perfect agents of investors, and it seeks to determine why these agents pay dividends. Other literature...
Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?
This paper analyzes the incentives of large shareholders to monitor public corporations. We investigate the hypothesis that a liquid stock market reduces large shareholders' inc...
Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis
Abstract The decision to go public is one of the most important and least studied questions in corporate finance. Most corporate finance textbooks limit themselves to describing...
Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany
This book analyses the widely-held view of the merits of the 'bank-based' German system of finance for investment, and shows that this view is not supported by evidence from the...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-225
- Citations
- 935
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1162/003355398555568