Abstract

The discovery of the endothelium as a crucial organ for the regulation of the vasculature to physiological needs and the recognition of endothelial dysfunction as a key pathological condition - which is associated with most if not all cardiovascular risk factors - led to a tremendous boost of endothelial research in the past 3 decades. Despite the possibility to measure endothelial function in the individual and its widespread use in research, its use as a clinical tool in daily medicine is not established yet. We review the most common methods to assess vascular function in humans and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore we give an overview about clinical settings were endothelial function measurements may be valuable in individual patients. Specifically, we provide information why endothelial function is not only a risk marker for cardiovascular risk but may also provides prognostic information beyond commonly used risk scores in primary prevention, and in patients with already established coronary disease.

Keywords

MedicineFunction (biology)Intensive care medicineCell biology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2012
Type
review
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
753-767
Citations
1097
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1097
OpenAlex

Cite This

Andreas J. Flammer, Todd J. Anderson, David S. Celermajer et al. (2012). The Assessment of Endothelial Function. Circulation , 126 (6) , 753-767. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.093245

Identifiers

DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.112.093245