Abstract

Although factor analysis has been a major contributing factor in advancing psychological research, a systematic assessment of how it has been applied is lacking. For this review we examined the Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , and Personnel Psychology over a ten‐year period (1975–1984) and located 152 studies that employed factor analysis. We then analyzed the choices made by the researchers concerning factor model, retention criteria, rotation, interpretation of factors and other issues relevant to factor analysis. The results indicate that choices made by researchers have generally been poor and that reporting practices have not allowed for informed review, cumulation of results, or replicability. A comparison of results by time interval (1975–1979; 1980–1984) revealed minimal differences in choices made or the quality of reporting practices. Suggestions for improving the use of factor analysis and the reporting of results are presented.

Keywords

PsychologyExploratory factor analysisFactor (programming language)Quality (philosophy)Applied psychologyMeta-analysisInterpretation (philosophy)Social psychologyClinical psychologyPsychometricsEpistemologyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
review
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
291-314
Citations
1686
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1686
OpenAlex

Cite This

J. Kevin Ford, Robert C. MacCallum, Marianne Tait (1986). THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS. Personnel Psychology , 39 (2) , 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x