The 22-Item Scale Used In Field Studies of Mental Illness: A Question of Method, a Question of Substance, and a Question of Theory

1973 Journal of Health and Social Behavior 153 citations

Abstract

The 22-item scale developed through the Midtown Manhattan Study is considered from methodological, substantive, and theoretical perspectives. This paper concludes that the instrument is, at best, a very incomplete measure of mental illness. A review of previous literature suggests a more reasonable interpretation is that it measures psychological stress and physical malaise, although even for these purposes it is a less than ideal measure. Use of the instrument examining the relationship between stressful life experiences and mental illness is further discouraged due to a conceptual confounding of the independent and dependent variables.

Keywords

Mental illnessPsychologyConfoundingInterpretation (philosophy)Scale (ratio)MalaiseMeasure (data warehouse)Field (mathematics)Clinical psychologySocial psychologyMental healthPsychiatryMedicineComputer science

Related Publications

A Diagnostic Interview

The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) was developed to reduce information variance in both the descriptive and diagnostic evaluation of a subject. The SA...

1978 Archives of General Psychiatry 5704 citations

Publication Info

Year
1973
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
252-252
Citations
153
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

153
OpenAlex

Cite This

Lauren H. Seiler (1973). The 22-Item Scale Used In Field Studies of Mental Illness: A Question of Method, a Question of Substance, and a Question of Theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 14 (3) , 252-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137117

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2137117