Keywords
Ceiling effectEQ-5DConstruct validityMedicineSF-36PsychometricsPublic healthQuality of life (healthcare)Index (typography)StatisticsPsychologyGerontologyClinical psychologyHealth related quality of lifeMathematicsAlternative medicineNursingComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: Results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China
The purpose of this study is to measure Chinese population health related quality of life (HRQoL) using European quality of life (EQ-5D) instrument, to examine the validity of E...
Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 Health Surveys in a General Population Survey in Alberta, Canada
The results of this investigation generally supported the validity of the EQ-5D. However, an important ceiling effect was observed for the EQ-5D in this sample. The combination ...
Using the EuroQoI 5-D in the Catalan general population: feasibility and construct validity.
Spanish and Catalan versions of the EuroQoi 5-D (EQ-5D) were included in the Catalan Health Interview Survey (CHIS) and administered to a randomly selected cross-section of 12,2...
Psychometric Comparison of the Standard EQ-5D to a 5 Level Version in Cancer Patients
Evidence supported the validity of both EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer. However, results suggest a 5-level classifier system has less ceiling effect and greater discriminative ...
EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
Established in 1987, the EuroQol Group initially comprised a network of international, multilingual and multidisciplinary researchers from seven centres in Finland, the Netherla...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1993
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-180
- Citations
- 700
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
700
OpenAlex
Cite This
John Brazier,
Norman Jones,
Paul Kind
(1993).
Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.
Quality of Life Research
, 2
(3)
, 169-180.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00435221
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1007/bf00435221