Abstract
Aims: To present background, principles, and procedures for a strategy for qualitative analysis called systematic text condensation and discuss this approach compared with related strategies. Methods: Giorgi’s psychological phenomenological analysis is the point of departure and inspiration for systematic text condensation. The basic elements of Giorgi’s method and the elaboration of these in systematic text condensation are presented, followed by a detailed description of procedures for analysis according to systematic text condensation. Finally, similarities and differences compared with other frequently applied methods for qualitative analysis are identified, as the foundation of a discussion of strengths and limitations of systematic text condensation. Results: Systematic text condensation is a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of different types of qualitative data, such as interview studies, observational studies, and analysis of written texts. The method represents a pragmatic approach, although inspired by phenomenological ideas, and various theoretical frameworks can be applied. The procedure consists of the following steps: 1) total impression – from chaos to themes; 2) identifying and sorting meaning units – from themes to codes; 3) condensation – from code to meaning; 4) synthesizing – from condensation to descriptions and concepts. Similarities and differences comparing systematic text condensation with other frequently applied qualitative methods regarding thematic analysis, theoretical methodological framework, analysis procedures, and taxonomy are discussed. Conclusions: Systematic text condensation is a strategy for analysis developed from traditions shared by most of the methods for analysis of qualitative data. The method offers the novice researcher a process of intersubjectivity, reflexivity, and feasibility, while maintaining a responsible level of methodological rigour.
Keywords
Thematic analysisCondensationQualitative researchSystematic reviewPsychologyMeaning (existential)Content analysisComputer scienceEpistemologySociologyMEDLINEPhysicsChemistrySocial sciencePsychotherapist
MeSH Terms
HumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignStatistics as Topic
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study
Abstract Qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis are two commonly used approaches in data analysis of nursing research, but boundaries between the two have not been c...
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
BackgroundThere is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In ...
Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis.
Thematic analysis (TA) is widely used in qualitative psychology. In using TA, researchers must choose between a diverse range of approaches that can differ considerably in their...
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I<i>not</i>use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches
Abstract Thematic analysis methods, including the reflexive approach we have developed, are widely used in counselling and psychotherapy research, as are other approaches that s...
Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education
Context Formal qualitative synthesis is the process of pooling qualitative and mixed‐method research data, and then drawing conclusions regarding the collective meaning of the r...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2012
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 795-805
- Citations
- 2177
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
2177
OpenAlex
254
Influential
1757
CrossRef
Cite This
Kirsti Malterud
(2012).
Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
, 40
(8)
, 795-805.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/1403494812465030
- PMID
- 23221918