Abstract

To gain knowledge about laboratory testing practices for parasitic diseases, in 2000 we surveyed 562 laboratories in 9 US states, and 455 (81%) responded. Most laboratories (59%) indicated that they send specimens off site for parasite screening, and most laboratories (89%) did not routinely test fecal specimens for Cryptosporidium species, Cyclospora cayetanensis, or microsporidia, unless testing for these organisms was specifically requested by a physician. Only 39 laboratories offered serological testing for Toxoplasma gondii, and most (78%) that had their results confirmed did so at national commercial laboratories rather than a Toxoplasma reference laboratory. Because most clinical laboratories do not routinely test fecal specimens for Cryptosporidium species, C. cayetanensis, or microsporidia, physicians must request specific testing for these organisms when they are clinically suspected; because of this lack of routine testing, it is difficult to estimate the true burden of disease due to these organisms.

Keywords

Cyclospora cayetanensisMedicineCryptosporidiumToxoplasmosisFecesToxoplasma gondiiPathologyImmunologyMicrobiologyBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
38
Issue
s3
Pages
S198-S202
Citations
37
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

37
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jeffrey L. Jones, Adriana Lopez, Susan P. Wahlquist et al. (2004). Survey of Clinical Laboratory Practices for Parasitic Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases , 38 (s3) , S198-S202. https://doi.org/10.1086/381587

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/381587