Abstract
To explain the phenomena in the world of our experience, to answer the question “why?” rather than only the question “what?”, is one of the foremost objectives of all rational inquiry; and especially, scientific research in its various branches strives to go beyond a mere description of its subject matter by providing an explanation of the phenomena it investigates. While there is rather general agreement about this chief objective of science, there exists considerable difference of opinion as to the function and the essential characteristics of scientific explanation. In the present essay, an attempt will be made to shed some light on these issues by means of an elementary survey of the basic pattern of scientific explanation and a subsequent more rigorous analysis of the concept of law and of the logical structure of explanatory arguments.
Keywords
EpistemologySubject (documents)Subject matterScientific theoryFunction (biology)Logical conjunctionScientific lawLogical analysisPhilosophy of scienceSociologyComputer scienceMathematicsPhilosophyMathematical statistics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Behind the market stage where real societies exist ‐ part I: The role of public and private order institutions
This two-part article is an attempt to clarify the social conditions upon which the viability and efficiency of the market system rest. It strives to show that the 'embeddedness...
From Machine Learning to Machine Reasoning
A plausible definition of "reasoning" could be "algebraically manipulating previously acquired knowledge in order to answer a new question". This definition covers first-order l...
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number...
What Theory is Not
We are grateful to Steve Barley, Max Bazerman, Daniel Brass, Gary Alan Fine, Linda Pike, Robert Kahn, James March, Marshall Meyer, Keith Murnighan, Christine Oliver, and David O...
Sociology and Modern Systems Theory.
processes. Until this is realized, Buckley maintains, arguments about sociological analysis will remain at the 'sophomoric' level. Peter Medawar, talking about Spencer, has poin...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1948
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-175
- Citations
- 3010
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
3010
OpenAlex
Cite This
Carl G. Hempel,
Paul Oppenheim
(1948).
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.
Philosophy of Science
, 15
(2)
, 135-175.
https://doi.org/10.1086/286983
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1086/286983