Abstract
In this article, we provide guidance for substantive researchers on the use of structural equation modeling in practice for theory testing and development. We present a comprehensive, two-step modeling approach that employs a series of nested models and sequential chi-square difference tests. We discuss the comparative advantages of this approach over a one-step approach. Considerations in specification, assessment of fit, and respecification of measurement models using confirmatory factor analysis are reviewed. As background to the two-step approach, the distinction between exploratory and confirmatory analysis, the distinction between complementary approaches for theory testing versus predictive application, and some developments in estimation methods also are discussed.
Keywords
Structural equation modelingPsychologyComputer scienceManagement scienceCalculus (dental)EconometricsMathematicsMedicineEngineeringMachine learningOrthodontics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
In this paper, we develop a classical approach to model selection. Using the Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion to measure the closeness of a model to the truth, we propose ...
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
The establishment of measurement invariance across groups is a logical prerequisite to conducting substantive cross-group comparisons (e.g., tests of group mean differences, inv...
In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings
Abstract Goodness-of-fit (GOF) indexes provide "rules of thumb"—recommended cutoff values for assessing fit in structural equation modeling. Hu and Bentler (1999) proposed a mor...
Using Formative Measures in International Marketing Models: A Cautionary Tale Using Consumer Animosity as an Example
Purpose – Despite the increasing use of formative measurement models in literature, little is known about potential consequences for substantive theory testing. Against this bac...
How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power
Abstract A common question asked by researchers is, "What sample size do I need for my study?" Over the years, several rules of thumb have been proposed. In reality there is no ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1988
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-423
- Citations
- 38507
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
38507
OpenAlex
Cite This
James C. Anderson,
David W. Gerbing
(1988).
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach..
Psychological Bulletin
, 103
(3)
, 411-423.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411