Abstract

In this paper a structural-contingency model drawn from the innovation literature is applied to the particular adaptive situation created by Affirmative Action requirements. If the initiation stage activities are essential to an effective adaptation, it is argued that organic structural characteristics will be associated with success. In situations where the need for, and alternative proposals for, change are known, success will depend on the performance of adoption and implementation stage activities. Therefore, it is argued that mechanistic characteristics will be associated with success. Affirmative Action compliance is decomposed into six behavioral dimensions, two of which require intitiation stage activities and several of which require adoption and implementation only. In general, the model is supported among a sample of small manufacturing firms. It is concluded that formalization is the predominant structural characteristic associated with Affirmative Action compliance, a result which may be generalizable to other regulatory contexts.

Keywords

Affirmative actionContingencyCompliance (psychology)Action (physics)Adaptation (eye)Contingency theoryProcess managementStructural equation modelingBusinessPsychologyRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceKnowledge managementSocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The causes of project failure

A study was conducted of 97 projects identified as failures by the projects' managers or parent organizations. Using the project implementation profile, a set of managerially co...

1990 IEEE Transactions on Engineering Mana... 594 citations

Publication Info

Year
1982
Type
article
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
75-93
Citations
28
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

28
OpenAlex
2
Influential
19
CrossRef

Cite This

Kenneth Marino (1982). Structural Correlates of Affirmative Action Compliance. Journal of Management , 8 (1) , 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638200800105

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/014920638200800105

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%