Abstract

June 1980, volume 25 This study examines relationships among strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. The analysis focuses on the perceptions of top managers in four industries (plastics, semiconductors, automotives, and air transportation). Findings indicate that these managers perceive four strategy types, Defender, Prospector, Analyzer, and Reactor, to be present within their industry. Defenders, Prospectors, and Analyzers all show competence in general and financial management. Beyond these two functions, Defenders and Prospectors have identifiable but different configurations of distinctive competence, while Analyzers' special capabilities are considerably less apparent. Reactors, as expected, have no consistent pattern of distinctive competence. Finally, although the data are only suggestive, Defenders, Prospectors, and Analyzers consistently outperform Reactors in competitive industries, but not in an industry that is highly regulated.*

Keywords

Competence (human resources)Competence-based managementCompetitive advantageBusinessPerceptionIndustrial organizationKnowledge managementMarketingPsychologyManagementComputer scienceEconomicsStrategic planning

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1980
Type
article
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
317-317
Citations
1358
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1358
OpenAlex

Cite This

Charles C. Snow, Lawrence G. Hrebiniak (1980). Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly , 25 (2) , 317-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392457

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2392457