Abstract
This study examines the relationship between interfirm asset specificity and performance in the auto industry. More specifically, I examine the extent to which differences in supplier–automaker asset specialization may explain performance differences between Japanese automakers (Nissan and Toyota) and U.S. automakers (Chrysler, Ford, General Motors). The findings indicate a positive relationship between supplier–automaker specialization and performance. In particular, the data suggest a positive relationship between interfirm human asset cospecialization and both quality and new model cycle time. Moreover, site specialization is found to be positively associated with lower inventory costs. The findings suggest that in the auto industry a tightly integrated production network characterized by proximity and a high level of human cospecialization will outperform a loosely integrated production network characterized by low levels of interfirm specialization.
Keywords
Automotive industryIndustrial organizationBusinessAsset (computer security)Supplier relationship managementAsset specificityProduction (economics)Auto industryCompetitive advantageMarketingEconomicsSupply chainMicroeconomicsComputer scienceSupply chain managementEngineering
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Does Governance Matter? <i>Keiretsu</i> Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Competitive Advantage
This empirical study suggests that Japanese competitive advantage in complex-product industries is at least partly due to differences in value chain governance and interfirm ass...
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
In this article we offer a view that suggests that a firm's critical resources may span firm boundaries and may be embedded in interfirm resources and routines. We argue that an...
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view
Abstract This paper elucidates the underlying economics of the resource‐based view of competitive advantage and integrates existing perspectives into a parsimonious model of res...
National Institutional Structures, Transaction Cost Economizing and Competitive Advantage: The Case of Japan
Japan’s economic success since World War II has been striking. Modern Japan was the first major industrial economy to emerge from outside the Western tradition. Economically dev...
Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration
Unstable market conditions caused by innovation and increasing intensity and diversity of competition have resulted in organizational capabilities rather than served markets bec...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 271-291
- Citations
- 1513
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1513
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jeffrey H. Dyer
(1996).
SPECIALIZED SUPPLIER NETWORKS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE AUTO INDUSTRY.
Strategic Management Journal
, 17
(4)
, 271-291.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199604)17:4<271::aid-smj807>3.0.co;2-y
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199604)17:4<271::aid-smj807>3.0.co;2-y