Abstract

Networks of several distinct types of social tie are aggregated by a dual model that partitions a population while simultaneously identifying patterns of relations. Concepts and algorithms are demonstrated in five case studies involving up to 100 persons and up to eight types of tie, over as many as 15 time periods. In each case the model identifies a concrete social structure. Role and position concepts are then identified and interpreted in terms of these new models of concrete social structure. Part II, to be published in the May issue of this Journal (Boorman and White 1976), will show how the operational meaning of role structures in small populations can be generated from the sociometric blockmodels of Part I.

Keywords

Dual (grammatical number)Social structureMeaning (existential)Network structureSociologyPosition (finance)Population structurePopulationSocial network (sociolinguistics)EpistemologyComputer scienceSocial psychologyTheoretical computer sciencePsychologyPolitical scienceLinguisticsDemographyEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Exploring modularity in biological networks

Network theoretical approaches have shaped our understanding of many different kinds of biological modularity. This essay makes the case that to capture these contributions, it ...

2020 Philosophical Transactions of the Roy... 44 citations

Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies

PART ONE: PREPARING THE WAY: LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS FOR ANALYSIS Foundations for Thinking and Working Qualitatively Thinking Qualitatively Thinking Methods (and methodology) Wor...

2020 Medical Entomology and Zoology 1387 citations

Publication Info

Year
1976
Type
article
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
730-780
Citations
2046
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2046
OpenAlex
33
Influential
1379
CrossRef

Cite This

Harrison C. White, Scott A. Boorman, Ronald L. Breiger (1976). Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. American Journal of Sociology , 81 (4) , 730-780. https://doi.org/10.1086/226141

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/226141

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%