Abstract
Abstract Recent moves in academic and policy circles to strengthen the social science research evidence base have raised questions about the quality and status of educational research. They have suggested a need for systematic research synthesis, for greater accessibility of sound educational research evidence, and greater respect for the perspectives of the different stakeholders in the educational research process. This paper looks at the background to 'the evidence movement', and discusses a particular government-funded initiative designed to take forward the challenge of systematic reviews of educational research. It considers some of the ways in which this activity poses challenges for social science methodology.
Keywords
Related Publications
Health promotion in Canada: 1986 to 2006
The evolution of health promotion in Canada between 1986 and 2006 is characterized by three major eras: Health Promotion in the Limelight, 1986-1992, Health Promotion Behind the...
Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: A systematic review of different study designs
Objective To examine the effectiveness and appropriateness of peer- delivered health promotion for young people. Design Systematic review of experimental studies assessing impac...
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the...
A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
EBP implementation is a complex process, and different stakeholders may hold different opinions regarding the relative importance of the impact of EBP implementation. Implementa...
Critically appraising qualitative research for systematic reviews: defusing the methodological cluster bombs
English This article examines the place of qualitative research within systematic reviews as evidence for policy, discusses the critical appraisal process as applied to qualitat...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2002
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-286
- Citations
- 124
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/0013191022000016329