Abstract
Abstract The present study is one of a series exploring the role of social categorization in intergroup behaviour. It has been found in our previous studies that in ‚minimal' situations, in which the subjects were categorized into groups on the basis of visual judgments they had made or of their esthetic preferences, they clearly discriminated against members of an outgroup although this gave them no personal advantage. However, in these previous studies division into groups was still made on the basis of certain criteria of ‚real' similarity between subjects who were assigned to the same category. Therefore, the present study established social categories on an explicitly random basis without any reference to any such real similarity. It was found that, as soon as the notion of ‚group' was introduced into the situation, the subjects still discriminated against those assigned to another random category. This discrimination was considerably more marked than the one based on a division of subjects in terms of interindividual similarities in which the notion of ‚group' was never explicitly introduced. In addition, it was found that fairness was also a determinant of the subjects' decisions. The results are discussed from the point of view of their relevance to a social‐cognitive theory of intergroup behaviour.
Keywords
CategorizationPsychologySimilarity (geometry)Social psychologyOutgroupRelevance (law)Ingroups and outgroupsSocial groupSocial categorySocial cognitionCognitionCognitive psychologyLinguisticsArtificial intelligence
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.
Experimental research on intergroup discrimination in favor of one's own group is reviewed in terms of the basis of differentiati on between in-group and outgroup and in terms o...
Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation
Abstract Two perspectives on the nature of the social group and psychological group formation are discussed. The traditional social cohesion approach traces group formation to p...
Come together: longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew's reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo‐French and Mexican‐American contexts
Abstract Both Anglo‐French and Mexican‐American relations are embedded in histories of conflict. Within these intergroup contexts, two longitudinal field studies of contact test...
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
Although several psychological theories predict that members of stigmatized groups should have low global self-esteem, empirical research typically does not support this predict...
Social representations, social attribution and social identity: The intergroup images of ‘public’ and ‘comprehensive’ schoolboys
Abstract Investigated the relationship between social representations, intergroup causal attributions and the search for a positive social identity in two rival groups from Brit...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1973
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-52
- Citations
- 1236
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1236
OpenAlex
29
Influential
795
CrossRef
Cite This
Michael Billig,
Henri Tajfel
(1973).
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour.
European Journal of Social Psychology
, 3
(1)
, 27-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030103
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420030103