Abstract
Multiobjective optimization is a powerful tool for resolving conflicting objectives in engineering design and numerous other fields. One general approach to solving multiobjective optimization problems involves generating a set of Pareto optimal solutions, followed by selecting the most attractive solution from this set as the final design. The success of this approach critically depends on the designer's ability to obtain, manage, and interpret the Pareto set—importantly, the size and distribution of the Pareto set. The potentially significant difficulties associated with comparing a significantly large number of Pareto designs can be circumvented when the Pareto set: (i) is adequately small, (ii) represents the complete Pareto frontier, (iii) emphasizes the regions of the Pareto frontier that entail significant tradeoff, and (iv) de-emphasizes the regions corresponding to little tradeoff. We call a Pareto set that possesses these four important and desirable properties a smart Pareto set. Specifically, a smart Pareto set is one that is small and effectively represents the tradeoff properties of the complete Pareto frontier. This article presents a general method to obtain smart Pareto sets for problems of n objectives, given previously generated sets of Pareto solutions. Under the proposed method, the designer uses a smart Pareto filter to control the size of the Pareto set and the degree of tradeoff representation among objectives. Importantly, the smart Pareto filter yields a Pareto set comprising a minimal number of solutions needed to adequately characterize the problem's tradeoff properties. In this article, the smart Pareto filter is analytically developed, and mathematical and physical examples are presented to illustrate the filter's effectiveness.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles
Secreted membrane‐enclosed vesicles, collectively called extracellular vesicles (EVs), which include exosomes, ectosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, apoptotic bodies and oth...
Geodesic Active Regions for Texture Segmentation
This paper proposes a framework for segmenting different textured areas over synthetic or real textured frames by curves propagation. We assume that the system has the ability t...
Handbook of Genetic Algorithms
This book sets out to explain what genetic algorithms are and how they can be used to solve real-world problems. The first objective is tackled by the editor, Lawrence Davis. Th...
Formation Control and Collision Avoidance for Multi-Agent Systems and a Connection between Formation Infeasibility and Flocking Behavior
A feedback control strategy that achieves convergence of a multi-agent system to a desired formation configuration avoiding at the same time collisions is proposed. The collisio...
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
The success of machine learning algorithms generally depends on data representation, and we hypothesize that this is because different representations can entangle and hide more...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 721-740
- Citations
- 151
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/0305215042000274942