SIZE-CORRECTION AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS FOR INTERSPECIFIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES

2009 Evolution 832 citations

Abstract

Phylogenetic methods for the analysis of species data are widely used in evolutionary studies. However, preliminary data transformations and data reduction procedures (such as a size-correction and principal components analysis, PCA) are often performed without first correcting for nonindependence among the observations for species. In the present short comment and attached R and MATLAB code, I provide an overview of statistically correct procedures for phylogenetic size-correction and PCA. I also show that ignoring phylogeny in preliminary transformations can result in significantly elevated variance and type I error in our statistical estimators, even if subsequent analysis of the transformed data is performed using phylogenetic methods. This means that ignoring phylogeny during preliminary data transformations can possibly lead to spurious results in phylogenetic statistical analyses of species data.

Keywords

BiologyInterspecific competitionEvolutionary biologyPrincipal component analysisZoologyEcologyStatisticsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Principal component analysis

Abstract Principal component analysis (PCA) is a multivariate technique that analyzes a data table in which observations are described by several inter‐correlated quantitative d...

2010 Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Compu... 9554 citations

Phylogenies and the Comparative Method

Comparative studies of the relationship between two phenotypes, or between a phenotype and an environment, are frequently carried out by invalid statistical methods. Most regres...

1985 The American Naturalist 9916 citations

Publication Info

Year
2009
Type
article
Volume
63
Issue
12
Pages
3258-3268
Citations
832
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

832
OpenAlex

Cite This

Liam J. Revell (2009). SIZE-CORRECTION AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS FOR INTERSPECIFIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES. Evolution , 63 (12) , 3258-3268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00804.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00804.x