Abstract

Psychiatry education, encompassing undergraduate and postgraduate training, has evolved markedly over recent decades, shaping how clinicians deliver evidence-based, compassionate, and culturally sensitive care. Despite its importance, psychiatry has historically received less emphasis than other medical specialties, with considerable variability in training worldwide. Traditional approaches, including lectures, bedside teaching, case discussions, and clinical rotations, have provided the foundation of learning. Innovations including interactive online platforms, gamification, simulation, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence can expand opportunities to build clinical skills, empathy, communication, leadership, and interprofessional collaboration. This article reflects on the evolution of psychiatry education, examining established practices, emerging needs, pedagogical innovations, evaluation strategies, and evolving competencies. It highlights the importance of competency-based assessment, structured feedback, and mentorship alongside flexible, locally adapted programmes and equitable global partnerships. Looking to the future, psychiatry education must integrate digital skills, leadership, advocacy, and collaborative practice, to prepare future psychiatrists for the societal, technological, and global health challenges of future decades.

Keywords

Psychiatry educationcompetency-based learningdigital psychiatrypedagogical innovationpsychiatry training

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2025
Type
article
Pages
1-10
Citations
0
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

0
OpenAlex
0
Influential

Cite This

Mariana Pinto da Costa, Savita Malhorta, Nagesh Pai et al. (2025). Shaping psychiatry education worldwide: lessons from the past and future directions. International Review of Psychiatry , 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2025.2584633

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/09540261.2025.2584633
PMID
41369082

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%