Abstract

Many substances used in daily life, such as coffee, alcohol, and pharmaceutical treatment for hypertension, have been accused of "menace" in causing cancer or other major diseases. Although some of the accusations have subsequently been refuted or withdrawn, they have usually been based on statistical associations in epidemiologic studies that could not be done with the customary experimental methods of science. With these epidemiologic methods, however, the fundamental scientific standards used to specify hypotheses and groups, get high-quality data, analyze attributable actions, and avoid detection bias may also be omitted. Despite peer-review approval, the current methods need substantial improvement to produce trustworthy scientific evidence.

Keywords

TrustworthinessScientific evidencePsychologyEnvironmental healthMedicineSocial psychologyStatisticsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1988
Type
review
Volume
242
Issue
4883
Pages
1257-1263
Citations
300
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

300
OpenAlex

Cite This

Alvan R. Feinstein (1988). Scientific Standards in Epidemiologic Studies of the Menace of Daily Life. Science , 242 (4883) , 1257-1263. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3057627

Identifiers

DOI
10.1126/science.3057627