Abstract

The probability sampling techniques used for quantitative studies are rarely appropriate when conducting qualitative research. This article considers and explains the differences between the two approaches and describes three broad categories of naturalistic sampling: convenience, judgement and theoretical models. The principles are illustrated with practical examples from the author's own research.

Keywords

Sampling (signal processing)MedicineJudgementProbability samplingQualitative researchManagement scienceNaturalistic observationResearch designData scienceEpistemologyStatisticsComputer scienceEnvironmental healthSocial scienceSociologyMathematics

MeSH Terms

Family PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedicineSampling StudiesSpecialization

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Sample size for qualitative research

Purpose Qualitative researchers have been criticised for not justifying sample size decisions in their research. This short paper addresses the issue of which sample sizes are a...

2016 Qualitative Market Research An Intern... 1485 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
522-526
Citations
4022
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

4022
OpenAlex
369
Influential
2325
CrossRef

Cite This

Martin Marshall (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice , 13 (6) , 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
PMID
9023528

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%