Risk, Science and Politics: Alachlor Regulation in Canada and the United States

1990 Canadian Journal of Political Science 29 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article is a comparative case study of environmental regulation in Canada and the United States, focussing on one important area of environmental regulation, pesticides, and on the treatment of North America's most commercially important pesticide, alachlor. Alachlor is a clear case of policy divergence: Canadians have banned the substance while the US has decided to keep it on the market with minimal restrictions. Three major explanations for the divergence are explored: science, interest group politics, and legal and institutional arrangements. The article concludes that while different interpretations of the risks posed by alachlor contributed to the different decisions, they can only be explained with reference to the economic importance of alachlor and the need to maintain the legitimacy of current institutional arrangements. The concluding section outlines a framework for explaining similarities and differences in environmental, health and safety regulations across nations.

Keywords

AlachlorLegitimacyPoliticsDivergence (linguistics)Political scienceState (computer science)Environmental regulationPublic administrationGeographyEnvironmental planningLawPesticideEcology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Building a New American State

This book is about governmental change in America. It examines the reconstruction of institutional power relationships that had to be negotiated among the courts, the parties, t...

1982 Cambridge University Press eBooks 1565 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
257-277
Citations
29
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

29
OpenAlex

Cite This

George Hoberg (1990). Risk, Science and Politics: Alachlor Regulation in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science , 23 (2) , 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900012245

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/s0008423900012245