Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the effect of the moral hazard problem in an agency relationship where the principal cannot observe the level of service provided by the agent. Using data from laboratory markets, we demonstrate that the presence of moral hazard leads to shirking by agents. However, this “lemons” phenomenon occurs only about one‐half of the time. While there is evidence of reputation effects in these markets, seemingly reputable agents are often able to use opportunities for false advertising to their advantage and “ripoff” principals.

Keywords

Moral hazardReputationAgency (philosophy)Principal–agent problemPhenomenonPrincipal (computer security)BusinessHazardService (business)MicroeconomicsActuarial scienceEconomicsMarketingPolitical scienceIncentiveFinanceLawSociologyComputer securityComputer scienceEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

DEBT AND TAXES*

The somewhat heterodox views about debt and taxes that will be presented here have evolved over the last few years in the course of countless discussions with several of my pres...

1977 The Journal of Finance 2954 citations

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
809-820
Citations
81
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

81
OpenAlex

Cite This

Douglas V. DeJong, Robert Forsythe, Russell J. Lundholm (1985). Ripoffs, Lemons, and Reputation Formation in Agency Relationships: A Laboratory Market Study. The Journal of Finance , 40 (3) , 809-820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05006.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05006.x