Abstract

Abstract We develop a framework for difference-in-differences designs with staggered treatment adoption and heterogeneous causal effects. We show that conventional regression-based estimators fail to provide unbiased estimates of relevant estimands absent strong restrictions on treatment-effect homogeneity. We then derive the efficient estimator addressing this challenge, which takes an intuitive “imputation” form when treatment-effect heterogeneity is unrestricted. We characterize the asymptotic behaviour of the estimator, propose tools for inference, and develop tests for identifying assumptions. Our method applies with time-varying controls, in triple-difference designs, and with certain non-binary treatments. We show the practical relevance of our results in a simulation study and an application. Studying the consumption response to tax rebates in the U.S., we find that the notional marginal propensity to consume is between 8 and 11% in the first quarter—about half as large as benchmark estimates used to calibrate macroeconomic models—and predominantly occurs in the first month after the rebate.

Keywords

EstimatorEconometricsInferenceCausal inferenceNotional amountEconomicsPoolingBenchmark (surveying)RegressionComputer scienceAverage treatment effectStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2024
Type
article
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
3253-3285
Citations
1273
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1273
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kirill Borusyak, Xavier Jaravel, Jann Spiess (2024). Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation. The Review of Economic Studies , 91 (6) , 3253-3285. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae007

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/restud/rdae007