Abstract
Many companies have been disappointed by a lack of results from their quality efforts. The financial benefits of quality, which had been assumed as a matter of faith in the “religion of quality,” are now being seriously questioned by cost-cutting executives, who cite the highly publicized financial failures of some companies prominent in the quality movement. In this increasingly results-oriented environment, managers must now justify their quality improvement efforts financially. The authors present the “return on quality” approach, which is based on the assumptions that (1) quality is an investment, (2) quality efforts must be financially accountable, (3) it is possible to spend too much on quality, and (4) not all quality expenditures are equally valid. The authors then provide a managerial framework that can be used to guide quality improvement efforts. This framework has several attractive features, including ensured managerial relevance and financial accountability.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research.
Despite the effort of researchers, editors and peer reviewers, the quality of health-research reporting in journal articles is unsatisfactory.1-6 Guidelines that specify a minim...
The Capital Structure Puzzle
Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...
Classification of the epilepsies 2011
The issue of classification of the epilepsies is an area that is capable of generating a great deal of passion. As usual, the heat is greatest when outcomes are dependent on opi...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 58-70
- Citations
- 1502
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/002224299505900205