Abstract

Rethinking Innateness asks the question, What does it really mean to say that a behavior is innate? The authors describe a new framework in which interactions, occurring at all levels, give rise to emergent forms and behaviors. These outcomes often may be highly constrained and universal, yet are not themselves directly contained in the genes in any domain-specific way. One of the key contributions of Rethinking Innateness is a taxonomy of ways in which a behavior can be innate. These include constraints at the level of representation, architecture, and timing; typically, behaviors arise through the interaction of constraints at several of these levels.The ideas are explored through dynamic models inspired by a new kind of a marriage of connectionist models and developmental neurobiology, forming a new theoretical framework for the study of behavioral development. While relying heavily on the conceptual and computational tools provided by connectionism, Rethinking Innateness also identifies ways in which these tools need to be enriched by closer attention to biology.

Keywords

ConnectionismCognitive sciencePerspective (graphical)Representation (politics)Domain (mathematical analysis)EpistemologyComputer sciencePsychologyArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkMathematicsPhilosophyPolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Finding Structure in Time

Time underlies many interesting human behaviors. Thus, the question of how to represent time in connectionist models is very important. One approach is to represent time implici...

1990 Cognitive Science 10427 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
book
Citations
2012
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

2012
OpenAlex

Cite This

M. Jackuelyn Harris, Annette Karmiloff‐Smith, Domenico Parisi et al. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) .