Abstract

Abstract Various ways to represent planning processes to test and draw policy implications from them are presented. We argue that three kinds of variables should be included: context, process and outcome. Four different models which incorporate these three variables are proposed, and data from a large public sector planning study are fitted to these four models. The findings suggest that the process‐outcome link is the key to understanding the effectiveness of planning processes.

Keywords

Outcome (game theory)Context (archaeology)Representation (politics)Process (computing)Key (lock)Process managementPublic sectorComputer scienceManagement scienceTest (biology)BusinessEconomicsPolitical scienceMicroeconomicsGeographyComputer security

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
211-231
Citations
65
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

65
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kimberly B. Boal, John M. Bryson (1987). Representation, testing and policy implications of planning processes. Strategic Management Journal , 8 (3) , 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080302

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250080302