Abstract
Abstract We present a formal and numerical comparison between the iterative and matrix‐inversion approaches of the polarizable continuum model. The formal analysis shows completely the equivalence of the two approaches. Numerical equivalence is also recovered, introducing in both methods the proper boundary conditions on the apparent charge distribution. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Continuum solvation models: A new approach to the problem of solute’s charge distribution and cavity boundaries
In continuum solvation models the definition of a cavity that embeds the solute molecule leads to problems related to the portion of solute’s electronic charge lying outside its...
CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II Protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model
Abstract A fluctuating charge (FQ) force field is applied to molecular dynamics simulations for six small proteins in explicit polarizable solvent represented by the TIP4P‐FQ po...
Treatment of the outlying charge in continuum solvation models
Continuum solvation models have proven to yield very valuable information about solvation effects, if cavities close to the van der Waals surface of the solutes are used for the...
Determination of Electrostatic Parameters for a Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator
A procedure to determine the electrostatic parameters has been developed for a polarizable empirical force field based on the classical Drude oscillator model. Atomic charges an...
The algebraic eigenvalue problem
Theoretical background Perturbation theory Error analysis Solution of linear algebraic equations Hermitian matrices Reduction of a general matrix to condensed form Eigenvalues o...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1449-1458
- Citations
- 1377
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540161202