Abstract

In two consecutive studies, we examined the interrater reliability and then the concurrent validity of interview ratings for individual symptoms of major depressive illness. The concurrent validity of symptoms was determined by assessing the degree to which symptoms observed or reported during an interview were observed in daily behavior. Results indicated that most signs and symptoms of major depression and melancholia can be reliably rated by clinicians during a semistructured interview. Ratings of observable symptoms (signs) assessed during the interview were valid indicators of dysfunction observed in daily behavior. Several but not all ratings based on patient report of symptoms were at variance with observation. These discordant patient-reported symptoms may have value as subjective reports but were not accurate descriptions of observed dysfunction.

Keywords

PsychologyReliability (semiconductor)Depressive symptomsClinical psychologyTest validityValidityPsychometricsPsychiatryAnxiety

Related Publications

The CES-D Scale

The CES-D scale is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population. The items of the scale are symptoms associated with depress...

1977 Applied Psychological Measurement 52180 citations

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
451-451
Citations
104
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

104
OpenAlex

Cite This

Carolyn M. Mazure (1986). Reliability and Validity of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Illness. Archives of General Psychiatry , 43 (5) , 451-451. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050053006

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050053006