Abstract

Although there are four large categories of research data, qualitative researchers have tended to emphasize interview data. Naive views of the interview, disembodied views of participant observation, and a virtual neglect of the material world have led to qualitative work that is not as full-bodied as it should be. Survey and qualitative researchers often share the realist’s assumption that interview responses index some external reality of facts and feelings, respectively. The Western cultural tendency to separate body from mind, and to elevate the mental over the corporeal, has trivialized the extent to which the body is the obvious point of departure for any process of knowing, especially participant observation. This cultural tendency, as well as a weakness for mistaking words for things and for viewing material objects as neutral and mute, contribute to the neglect of the material world.

Keywords

NeglectQualitative researchFeelingPsychologyParticipant observationSocial psychologyPoint (geometry)SociologySocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation

Offering a detailed introduction to the practice of data analysis, this book is both user-friendly and theoretically grounded. Drawing on his extensive experience of qualitative...

2002 eCite Digital Repository (University ... 1732 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
104-115
Citations
292
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

292
OpenAlex

Cite This

Margarete Sandelowski (2002). Reembodying Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research , 12 (1) , 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001008

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1049732302012001008