Abstract
In this paper, we describe a case study of a sentence-level categorization in which tagging instructions are developed and used by four judges to classify clauses from the Wall Street Journal as either subjective or objective . Agreement among the four judges is analyzed, and based on that analysis, each clause is given a final classification. To provide empirical support for the classifications, correlations are assessed in the data between the subjective category and a basic semantic class posited by Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik (1985).
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Introduction Since its publication in 1985, the outstanding 1,800-page Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Ja...
DiSAN: Directional Self-Attention Network for RNN/CNN-Free Language Understanding
Recurrent neural nets (RNN) and convolutional neural nets (CNN) are widely used on NLP tasks to capture the long-term and local dependencies, respectively. Attention mechanisms ...
Terminology and organization of seizures and epilepsies: Radical changes not justified by new evidence
The classifications and terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) provide a conceptual framework for organizing and differentiating epileptic seizures and ...
Analysis of polarity information in medical text.
Knowing the polarity of clinical outcomes is important in answering questions posed by clinicians in patient treatment. We treat analysis of this information as a classification...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1999
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-205
- Citations
- 174
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1017/s1351324999002181