Abstract

Ranibizumab was superior to verteporfin as intravitreal treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with low rates of serious ocular adverse events. Treatment improved visual acuity on average at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00061594 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Keywords

VerteporfinMedicineRanibizumabMacular degenerationOphthalmologyVisual acuityEndophthalmitisSurgeryBevacizumabChoroidal neovascularizationChemotherapy

MeSH Terms

AgedAged80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodiesMonoclonalAntibodiesMonoclonalHumanizedChoroidal NeovascularizationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjectionsMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsRanibizumabVerteporfinVisual Acuity

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
article
Volume
355
Issue
14
Pages
1432-1444
Citations
3441
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3441
OpenAlex
191
Influential
2757
CrossRef

Cite This

David M. Brown, Peter K. Kaiser, Mark Michels et al. (2006). Ranibizumab versus Verteporfin for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine , 355 (14) , 1432-1444. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa062655

Identifiers

DOI
10.1056/nejmoa062655
PMID
17021319

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%