Abstract

This study tested whether students who learned with an active orientation would be more intrinsically motivated to learn and would learn more than students who learned with a passive orientation. The active orientation was created by having subjects learn material with the expectation of teaching it to another student; the passive orientation was created by having subjects learn the same material with the expectation of being tested on it. The results indicate that subjects who learned in order to teach were more intrinsically motivated, had higher conceptual learning scores, and perceived themselves to be more actively engaged with the environment than subjects who learned in order to be examined. The two groups were equal, however, in their rote learning scores. The effects of exposure to the material were ruled out as an explanation because the two groups reported spending equal time with the material. The results are discussed in terms of intrinsic motivation theory.

Keywords

Set (abstract data type)Orientation (vector space)PsychologyQuality (philosophy)Mathematics educationRote learningActive learning (machine learning)Cognitive psychologyOrder (exchange)Goal orientationConcept learningSocial psychologyTeaching methodCooperative learningComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
755-755
Citations
95
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

95
OpenAlex

Cite This

Carl A. Benware, Edward L. Deci (1984). Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal , 21 (4) , 755-755. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162999

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1162999