Abstract

Previous studies using clinical performance measures suggest that quality of care for patients with multiple chronic conditions is not worse than that for others. This article presents patient-reported experiences of health care among 8,973 of chronically ill adults from eight countries, using telephone survey data. We designed a ‘‘morbidity score’’ combining the number of conditions and reported health status. Respondents with high morbidity scores reported less favorable experience with coordination of care compared to those with low morbidity scores. They also reported lower ratings of overall quality of care. There were no differences in reported experience with the individual physicians. Comparing type of comorbidity, chronic lung, and mental health problems were associated with lower ratings than hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, and cancer. The implications and limitations of this study are discussed in the context of health care reform. Pay-for-performance programs need to account for chronic conditions to avoid penalizing physicians who care for larger shares of such patients.

Keywords

MedicineComorbidityContext (archaeology)Health careChronic conditionQuality of life (healthcare)Chronic careMEDLINEMental healthPatient satisfactionFamily medicineChronic diseaseDiseaseNursingPsychiatryInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
343-364
Citations
90
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

90
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jako Burgers, Gerlienke E. Voerman, Richard Grol et al. (2010). Quality and Coordination of Care for Patients With Multiple Conditions: Results From an International Survey of Patient Experience. Evaluation & the Health Professions , 33 (3) , 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278710375695

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0163278710375695