Promoting an open research culture

Brian A. Nosek; George Alter; George C. Banks; Denny Borsboom; Sara Bowman; Steven J. Breckler; Stuart Buck; Chris Chambers; G. J. Chin; Garret Christensen; Mónica Contestabile; Allan Dafoe; Eric Eich; Jeremy Freese; Rachel Glennerster; Daniel L. Goroff; D. P. Green; Bradford W. Hesse; Macartan Humphreys; John Ishiyama; Dean Karlan; Alan Kraut; Arthur Lupia; Patricia L. Mabry; Temina Madon; Neil Malhotra; Evan Mayo‐Wilson; Marcia McNutt; Edward Miguel; Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Uri Simonsohn; Courtney K. Soderberg; Barbara A. Spellman; James Turitto; Gary R. VandenBos; Simine Vazire; Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers; Rory Wilson; Tal Yarkoni

doi:10.1126/science.aab2374

Abstract

Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility

Keywords

Openness to experienceTransparency (behavior)Open scienceReproducibilityComputer sciencePsychologyChemistrySocial psychologyChromatographyComputer securityMathematicsStatistics

Related Publications

Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources

Michael Gusenbauer , Neal Haddaway

Rigorous evidence identification is essential for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (evidence syntheses) because the sample selection of relevant studies determines a review'...

2019 Research Synthesis Methods 1754 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

Larissa Shamseer , David Moher , Mike Clarke +5 more

Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct,...

2015 BMJ 12371 citations

An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

Daniël Lakens

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practic...

2012 Perspectives on Psychological Science 623 citations

Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses

Martina K. Linnenluecke , Mauricio Marrone , Abhay Kumar Singh

Literature reviews play an essential role in academic research to gather existing knowledge and to examine the state of a field. However, researchers in business, management and...

2019 Australian Journal of Management 1353 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

David Moher , Alessandro Liberati , Jennifer Tetzlaff +1 more

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a...

2010 International Journal of Surgery 11256 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2015
Type: article
Volume: 348
Issue: 6242
Pages: 1422-1425
Citations: 2617
Access: Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric

Promoting an open research culture

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2617

OpenAlex

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                
                                    Brian A. Nosek, 
                                
                                    George Alter, 
                                
                                    George C. Banks
                                
                                et al.
                            
                            (2015). 
                            Promoting an open research culture. 
                            Science
                            , 348
                            (6242)
                            , 1422-1425.
                            https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
                        

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1126/science.aab2374