Abstract

Although problems of reliability and validity have been explored thoroughly by experimenters and other quantitative researchers, their treatment by ethnographers has been sporadic and haphazard. This article analyzes these constructs as defined and addressed by ethnographers. Issues of reliability and validity in ethnographic design are compared to their counterparts in experimental design. Threats to the credibility of ethnographic research are summarized and categorized from field study methodology. Strategies intended to enhance credibility are incorporated throughout the investigative process: study design, data collection, data analysis, and presentation of findings. Common approaches to resolving various categories of contamination are illustrated from the current literature in educational ethnography.

Keywords

CredibilityEthnographyReliability (semiconductor)ValidityResearch designData collectionPresentation (obstetrics)PsychologyField (mathematics)Management scienceApplied psychologyComputer scienceSociologySocial scienceEpistemologyPsychometricsEngineeringMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPower (physics)Mathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1982
Type
article
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
31-60
Citations
1630
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1630
OpenAlex

Cite This

Margaret D. LeCompte, Judith Goetz (1982). Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research. Review of Educational Research , 52 (1) , 31-60. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001031

Identifiers

DOI
10.3102/00346543052001031