Abstract
Abstract Selecting an appropriate set of confounders for which to control is critical for reliable causal inference. Recent theoretical and methodological developments have helped clarify a number of principles of confounder selection. When complete knowledge of a causal diagram relating all covariates to each other is available, graphical rules can be used to make decisions about covariate control. Unfortunately, such complete knowledge is often unavailable. This paper puts forward a practical approach to confounder selection decisions when the somewhat less stringent assumption is made that knowledge is available for each covariate whether it is a cause of the exposure, and whether it is a cause of the outcome. Based on recent theoretically justified developments in the causal inference literature, the following proposal is made for covariate control decisions: control for each covariate that is a cause of the exposure, or of the outcome, or of both; exclude from this set any variable known to be an instrumental variable; and include as a covariate any proxy for an unmeasured variable that is a common cause of both the exposure and the outcome. Various principles of confounder selection are then further related to statistical covariate selection methods.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A Structural Approach to Selection Bias
The term "selection bias" encompasses various biases in epidemiology. We describe examples of selection bias in case-control studies (eg, inappropriate selection of controls) an...
Instrumental Variables Estimation With Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization
Instrumental variables have been widely used for estimating the causal effect between exposure and outcome. Conventional estimation methods require complete knowledge about all ...
Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician
Abstract Statistical models support medical research by facilitating individualized outcome prognostication conditional on independent variables or by estimating effects of risk...
Are There Two Logistic Regressions for Retrospective Studies?
A comparison is made between two different approaches to the linear logistic regression analysis of retrospective study data: the prospective model wherein the dependent variabl...
Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies
In Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, where genetic variants are used as proxy measures for an exposure trait of interest, obtaining adequate statistical power is frequently ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2019
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-219
- Citations
- 1314
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6