Abstract

Heavy metal accumulation in soil has been rapidly increased due to various natural processes and anthropogenic (industrial) activities. As heavy metals are non-biodegradable, they persist in the environment, have potential to enter the food chain through crop plants, and eventually may accumulate in the human body through biomagnification. Owing to their toxic nature, heavy metal contamination has posed a serious threat to human health and the ecosystem. Therefore, remediation of land contamination is of paramount importance. Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly approach that could be a successful mitigation measure to revegetate heavy metal-polluted soil in a cost-effective way. To improve the efficiency of phytoremediation, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in plant is indispensable. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of how heavy metals are taken up, translocated, and detoxified in plants. We focus on the strategies applied to improve the efficiency of phytostabilization and phytoextraction, including the application of genetic engineering, microbe-assisted and chelate-assisted approaches.

Keywords

PhytoremediationEnvironmental remediationBiomagnificationEnvironmental scienceRevegetationFood chainPhytoextraction processHeavy metalsSoil contaminationContaminationEnvironmental chemistrySoil waterLand reclamationEcologyChemistryHyperaccumulatorBiologySoil science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
review
Volume
11
Pages
359-359
Citations
1437
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1437
OpenAlex
53
Influential
1195
CrossRef

Cite This

Yan An, Yamin Wang, Swee Ngin Tan et al. (2020). Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land. Frontiers in Plant Science , 11 , 359-359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00359

Identifiers

DOI
10.3389/fpls.2020.00359
PMID
32425957
PMCID
PMC7203417

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%