Abstract
With increasing scientific collaboration, visibility of individual role-performance has diminished. Ordering of author's names is an adaptive device which symbolizes their relative contributions to research. Interviews with Nobel laureates and comparisons of their name-order practices to those of other scientists suggests that this symbol is ambiguos and makes evaluation of individual role-performance difficult. A probability model of expected distributions of name orders is used in measuring preferences for particular sequences, and these preferences vary with the authors' eminence. On the assumption that authors' names are listed in order of the value of their contributions, laureates should be first-authors more often than other scientists; in fact, they are not. Instead, they exercise their noblesse oblige by giving credit to less eminent co-workers increasigly as their eminence grows. They do so more often after the prize, and eminent laureates-to-be forego first-authorship more foten than those as yet unrecognized. This noblesse oblige, however, has its limits; laureates' contributions to prize-winning research are more visible than contributions to thier other research.
Keywords
AmbiguityValue (mathematics)Order (exchange)Symbol (formal)VisibilitySociologyPositive economicsEpistemologyPsychologyLinguisticsPhilosophyEconomicsMathematicsStatisticsGeography
Related Publications
The crystal structure of α-manganese
It has been shown independently by Westgren and Phragmén, and by one of the present authors, that manganese is allotropic. Both investigations pointed to the existence of three ...
Scientific Journals and Their Authors’ Financial Interests: A Pilot Study
<b>Background:</b> The credibility of modern science is grounded on the perception of the objectivity of its scientists, but that credibility can be undermined by fi...
Behavioral science in diabetes. Contributions and opportunities.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current status of behavioral research and practice in diabetes and to identify promising future directions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We review be...
The skewness of science
Scientific publications are cited to a variable extent. Distributions of article citedness are therefore found to be very skewed even for articles written by the same author, ap...
Handbook of Genetic Algorithms
This book sets out to explain what genetic algorithms are and how they can be used to solve real-world problems. The first objective is tackled by the editor, Lawrence Davis. Th...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1968
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 276-291
- Citations
- 244
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
244
OpenAlex
Cite This
Harriet Zuckerman
(1968).
Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity.
American Journal of Sociology
, 74
(3)
, 276-291.
https://doi.org/10.1086/224641
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1086/224641