Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review

2004 British journal of rheumatology 207 citations

Abstract

In the absence of comparative evidence, the large number of patient-assessed instruments for knee problems makes instrument selection difficult. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Pain Scale and Oxford Knee Score have good evidence for reliability, content validity and construct validity. The KOOS and Oxford instruments also have evidence for responsiveness. The instruments have not been evaluated for all knee problems, and instrument appropriateness, including content relevance, must be assessed before application. The comparative evaluation of instruments is recommended.

Keywords

Content validityReliability (semiconductor)Construct validityPhysical therapyMedicineConstruct (python library)Scale (ratio)PopulationValidityPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychometricsClinical psychologyComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life

Clinicians and policymakers are recognizing the importance of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) to inform patient management and policy decisions. Self- or intervi...

1993 Annals of Internal Medicine 3924 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
review
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
1414-1423
Citations
207
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

207
OpenAlex

Cite This

Andrew Garratt (2004). Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. British journal of rheumatology , 43 (11) , 1414-1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh362

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/keh362