Abstract

Podsakoff and Todor (1985) proposed partialling the first principal component from observed correlations as a procedure for controlling method variance. Using mathematical derivations and Monte Carlo simulation, we found that this procedure is biased. Partialling out the first principal component introduces a negative bias into the resulting correlations that seriously compromises subsequent analysis. Moreover, the extent of bias is not reduced by increasing sample size; however, it is inversely proportional to the number of variables. Therefore, partialling the first principal component is not recommended. Researchers are encouraged to collect data with multiple methods whenever feasible.

Keywords

Principal component analysisVariance (accounting)Monte Carlo methodStatisticsFactor analysisComponent (thermodynamics)EconometricsVariance componentsSample (material)MathematicsChemistryChromatographyEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM

The author discusses common method bias in the context of structural equation modeling employing the partial least squares method (PLS-SEM). Two datasets were created through a ...

2015 International Journal of e-Collaboration 6625 citations

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
525-530
Citations
99
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

99
OpenAlex

Cite This

Edward R. Kemery, William P. Dunlap (1986). Partialling Factor Scores Does Not Control Method Variance: A Reply to Podsakoff and Todor. Journal of Management , 12 (4) , 525-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200407

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/014920638601200407