Abstract

This article summarizes the phenomenon of cancer overdiagnosis-the diagnosis of a "cancer" that would otherwise not go on to cause symptoms or death. We describe the two prerequisites for cancer overdiagnosis to occur: the existence of a silent disease reservoir and activities leading to its detection (particularly cancer screening). We estimated the magnitude of overdiagnosis from randomized trials: about 25% of mammographically detected breast cancers, 50% of chest x-ray and/or sputum-detected lung cancers, and 60% of prostate-specific antigen-detected prostate cancers. We also review data from observational studies and population-based cancer statistics suggesting overdiagnosis in computed tomography-detected lung cancer, neuroblastoma, thyroid cancer, melanoma, and kidney cancer. To address the problem, patients must be adequately informed of the nature and the magnitude of the trade-off involved with early cancer detection. Equally important, researchers need to work to develop better estimates of the magnitude of overdiagnosis and develop clinical strategies to help minimize it.

Keywords

OverdiagnosisMedicineCancerLung cancerDiseasePopulationObservational studyBreast cancerProstate cancerOncologyInternal medicineThyroid cancerIntensive care medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
review
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
605-613
Citations
1543
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1543
OpenAlex

Cite This

H. Gilbert Welch, William C. Black (2010). Overdiagnosis in Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 102 (9) , 605-613. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq099

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/jnci/djq099