Abstract

Found in two studies that the Life Orientation Test (LOT) had limited discriminant validity relative to measures of neuroticism. Furthermore, although previous correlations of the LOT with measures of symptom reports and coping behaviors were replicated, these correlations were eliminated when neuroticism was controlled. In contrast, the correlations of symptoms and coping with neuroticism remained significant when LOT scores were controlled. Thus, the LOT is virtually indistinguishable from measures of neuroticism, and previously reported findings using this scale are perhaps more parsimoniously interpreted as reflecting neuroticism rather than optimism. These findings are discussed in terms of existing support for models of optimism and self-control and general methodological issues in studies of personality and health.

Keywords

NeuroticismPsychologyOptimismCoping (psychology)PersonalityClinical psychologyDiscriminant validityBig Five personality traitsPersonality testSocial psychologyPsychometricsDevelopmental psychologyTest validityInternal consistency

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1989
Type
article
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
640-648
Citations
325
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

325
OpenAlex
12
Influential
234
CrossRef

Cite This

Timothy W. Smith, Mary Katherine Pope, Frederick Rhodewalt et al. (1989). Optimism, neuroticism, coping, and symptom reports: An alternative interpretation of the Life Orientation Test.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56 (4) , 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.640

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.640
PMID
2709311

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%