Abstract
Two formulas are presented for judging the significance of the difference between correlated proportions. The chi square equivalent of one of the developed formulas is pointed out.
Keywords
MathematicsStatisticsSampling (signal processing)Statistical significance
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A power primer.
One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard mate...
A power primer.
One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard mate...
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Preface.Preface to the Second Edition.Preface to the First Edition.1. An Introduction to Applied Probability.2. Statistical Inference for a Single Proportion.3. Assessing Signif...
Significance Testing of Difference Potentials
ABSTRACT This note provides a statistical‐graphical method for the evaluation of the statistical significance of difference potentials from a group of subjects, and for the comp...
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Factor analysis, path analysis, structural equation modeling, and related multivariate statistical methods are based on maximum likelihood or generalized least squares estimatio...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1947
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-157
- Citations
- 4005
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
4005
OpenAlex
Cite This
Quinn McNemar
(1947).
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages.
Psychometrika
, 12
(2)
, 153-157.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02295996
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1007/bf02295996