Abstract

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is widely used to study biological macromolecules that comprise regions with disorder, flexibility or partial occupancy. For example, membrane proteins are often kept in solution with detergent micelles and lipid nanodiscs that are locally disordered. Such spatial variability negatively impacts computational three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction with existing iterative refinement algorithms that assume rigidity. We introduce non-uniform refinement, an algorithm based on cross-validation optimization, which automatically regularizes 3D density maps during refinement to account for spatial variability. Unlike common shift-invariant regularizers, non-uniform refinement systematically removes noise from disordered regions, while retaining signal useful for aligning particle images, yielding dramatically improved resolution and 3D map quality in many cases. We obtain high-resolution reconstructions for multiple membrane proteins as small as 100 kDa, demonstrating increased effectiveness of cryo-EM for this class of targets critical in structural biology and drug discovery. Non-uniform refinement is implemented in the cryoSPARC software package.

Keywords

Regularization (linguistics)AlgorithmComputer scienceParticle (ecology)Computational biologyBiological systemPhysicsArtificial intelligenceBiology

MeSH Terms

AlgorithmsCryoelectron MicroscopyImagingThree-DimensionalIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSoftware

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2020
Type
article
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1214-1221
Citations
1632
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1632
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ali Punjani, Haowei Zhang, David J. Fleet (2020). Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nature Methods , 17 (12) , 1214-1221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8

Identifiers

DOI
10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8
PMID
33257830

Data Quality

Data completeness: 90%