Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship

1967 American Sociological Review 327 citations

Abstract

Nobel laureates in science publish more and are more apt to collaborate than a matched sample of scientists. Interviews with 41 of 55 laureates and comparison of their research output with the output of the matched sample indicate that these patterns hold at every stage of the life-work-cycle. As laureates report and as their publications corroborate, they exercise noblesse oblige in arranging co-authorship in collaborative publications. Receipt of the Nobel prize is followed by declining productivity and changed work practices, as a result of changed role obligations and activities. Reductions in productivity are more severe for laureates who experience comparatively large increments in prestige through the prize than for those who were already eminent. The prize generates strain in collaborative associations so that most of these terminate soon after the award

Keywords

ReceiptProductivityPrestigeSample (material)PublicationWork (physics)SociologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawEconomicsEconomic growthEngineeringPhilosophyAccountingLinguistics

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1967
Type
article
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
391-391
Citations
327
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

327
OpenAlex

Cite This

Harriet Zuckerman (1967). Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship. American Sociological Review , 32 (3) , 391-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091086

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2091086