Abstract
Nobel laureates in science publish more and are more apt to collaborate than a matched sample of scientists. Interviews with 41 of 55 laureates and comparison of their research output with the output of the matched sample indicate that these patterns hold at every stage of the life-work-cycle. As laureates report and as their publications corroborate, they exercise noblesse oblige in arranging co-authorship in collaborative publications. Receipt of the Nobel prize is followed by declining productivity and changed work practices, as a result of changed role obligations and activities. Reductions in productivity are more severe for laureates who experience comparatively large increments in prestige through the prize than for those who were already eminent. The prize generates strain in collaborative associations so that most of these terminate soon after the award
Keywords
Related Publications
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
As a communications system, the network of journals that play a paramount role in the exchange of scientific and technical information is little understood. Periodically since 1...
TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies
Phylogenies are extremely useful tools, not only for establishing genealogical relationships among a group of organisms or their parts (e.g. genes), but also for a variety of re...
ブドウ・安芸クイ-ン (特集 果樹の最近の注目品種)
<P>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</P><p><strong>Background</strong><br>The <em>Labour Force Su...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1967
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-391
- Citations
- 327
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/2091086